Those who are designing SCCM can follow this .
Sunday, 27 October 2013
Are you Designing SCCM - Have a lot at this
Those who are designing SCCM can follow this .
Tuesday, 15 October 2013
SCCM Design Steps - Explained in Detail - Part # 1
Today, in this post we will see how to design a SCCM Environment . Using this post you may design your SCCM design document . To create a SCCM Environment , it is very important that we have some detailed information . For the sake of simplicity , we will use a simple example here .
Let us Assume that we are being asked to design , architect and implement a sccm ( System Center Configuration Manager 2012) environment with following specifications :
1. The Client has presence in 5 states of India .
2. Total user base is : 5000
3. Head office is in Mumbai : with a user base of : 4000
4. at the head office the number of servers to be maintained using sccm is : 100
4. Four Other offices are in : Bangalore , Kolkata , Delhi and Himachal .
5. User base at all these four locations is : 250 each .
6. There is a 4 Mbps connectivity between branches ( all of them ) .
7. The link utilization is below 50 % on an average during office hours and is 30 % off hours
8. Client wants to use all the features of SCCM ( OSD , Patch management , Software deployment etc ).
9. There is just one forest and one domain Ex : abctelecom.com
10 . Internet clients are not a part of this project
11. There are no cloud DP's .
The above information is handy enough to kick start our designing :
Now , To start with , we have to make a decision as to how many sites we require : or you may ask the following questions to yourself :
1. How Many SCCM Primary Sites do I need : In this case since the total Client base is just 5000 . Since with SCCM 2012 we can clearly divide work between engineers who manage Servers and clients .
2. Do we need a CAS : NO . CAS in SCCM 2012 is only used for Centralized repository and reporting .
3. How Many Secondary sites do I need : This is a very Tricky Question and this is where a lot has changed between SCCM 2007 and SCCM 2012 . SCCM 2012 DP can be used for PXE i.e OSD , Throttling and Scheduling . So , We would only need DP's in our case as the bandwidth available is also good .
See the below blog posts for more clarity :
http://sccmconfighelp.wordpress.com/2013/04/25/primary-site-vs-secondary-site-vs-distribution-point-sccm-2012-which-one-to-choose-and-when-to-choose
http://sccmconfighelp.wordpress.com/2013/10/08/sccm-distribution-point-design-a-designers-delight/
Now , that we are sure that we need just One Primary and Distribution Points only , Am done with my first part .
So , so far our design looks like : 1 Primary stand Alone site and 4 Distribution Points at 4 different locations .
I close this post here and will take things in more details in the Part 2 of this series .
Part 2 of this Series : http://sccmconfighelp.wordpress.com/2013/10/16/sccm-design-steps-explained-in-detail-part-2/
Monday, 7 October 2013
SCCM Distribution Point Design - A Designer's Delight
Ask any SCCM Designer / Architect !! How Many Distribution Points you need in this Environment and he would bend his head and do zillion odd Calculations :-)
With this Post I intend to share a Table which shows how much time is required over a specific WAN link for a set of PC's :
The Below Table Shows the Approximate results for 1 Single Machine over WAN and LAN . From the results it is very clear that for Distribution Point the results are better
* Note : The figures mentioned above are approximate . Actual s may vary a little .
Now , Let us see the results for 50 Machines at a Local Branch with Different Bandwidth Options . Clearly you would see that if we are not going to use a Local Distribution Point then deployments like Operating system would choke the network and would a lot of time .
As you can see from the above Image , if we have a 2 MBPS line between the Primary server and the Local branch and there is No distribution Point ( Local ) , them for a set of 50 machines at such a location would take 200 hours for getting the OSD files . However , if we have a Local Distribution Point at the Branch Location , Machines would pick the Image over a LAN and it would just take 3 Hours of time . That's the power of a Local Distribution Point .
** The Calculations above are based on the assumption that all the bandwidth is available to SCCM .
It is also important to understand that the Traffic between Primary and Distribution Point can be scheduled and Throttled .
Monday, 17 June 2013
SCCM Design - Understanding your Network and Important Fact Points
Some of the Main point to be considered with regards Network While Designing SCCM are :
1. Network Usage : Get in touch with the Network Team and try and find the Network Usage across Branches . This will give you a very solid idea about DP Design .
2. Try and restrict a DP to 50 Machines for a 2 Mbps Line with average utilization o about 50 %
3. Gather All the relevant Network Diagrams from the Network Team.
4. What is the count of Local DC's in the Organization .
5. Gather the Data with regards the Number of Systems , OS across locations
Thursday, 25 April 2013
Primary Site vs Secondary Site vs Distribution Point ( SCCM 2012 ) !! Which one to choose and when to Choose ?
Normally You would find SCCM Architects / Designers / Administrators in a Dilemma when it comes to Which one to choose : A Primary Site vs Secondary Site vs a Distribution Point :-
OK I will try to make life easy for you here : Choose a Primary When you want to manage Clients Directly . Choose Distribution point at almost most of the occasions except for :
- Scenarios where : You want to manage the Upwards flow of Data , You want to have a local SUP ( Software Update Point ) , You want to have a local Management Point so that Clients Pick up policies and report to this Local MP , and your low bandwidth site has more than 500 Client Machines ( When i Say 500 , its a ball parking figure ) .
I hope I have made life Easy for you here . So next time you design a SCCM 2012 Environment for a Client Do consider the above mentioned points .